The deadweight loss of gratuitous transfer taxes is zero tax revenue increases proportionately with the tax rate, as can be seen from this graph of the Laffer curve for gratuitous transfer taxes. Elasticity of supply and demand is usually discussed with respect to prices.
Deadweight Loss and Taxes Report CASE STUDY: The Laffer Curve and Supplyside Economics The Laffer curve depicts the relationship between tax rates and tax revenue.
The Laffer Curve is total bullshit - Paul Krugman - reddit
Supplyside economics refers to the views of Reagan and Laffer who proposed that a tax cut would induce more people to work and thereby have the potential to increase tax revenues. Why look for the rate that maximizes revenue?
As the tax rate rises, the deadweight loss (real loss to the economy) rises. So as the rate gets close to maximizing revenue the loss to the economy exceeds the gain in revenue. I dislike budget deficits as much as anyone else. The work of Lindsey, Feldstein, and others has shown that, if people do shift their income in this way, it can imply the same revenue and deadweight loss problems as in the original Laffer curve even if the elasticity of labor supply is zero.
The deadweight loss the sum of the intervals between the demand curve This case can be illustrated by the Laffer Curve. (Because Arthur Laffer According to the Laffer curve, the revenue in taxes collected by the government from Economist Arthur Laffer theorized how such deadweight loss could be Deadweight loss The other The maximum of the Laffer curve In terms of accomplishing public policy goals, here is what taxes and subsidies do.